A PEX crimp ring and a PEX cinch clamp are two ways to lock the same barbed insert fitting onto the pipe. The crimp ring is copper (ASTM F1807), squeezed round with size-specific jaws and checked with a go/no-go gauge. The cinch clamp is stainless steel (ASTM F2098), closed at one raised ear with one tool that covers 3/8 to 1 inch. Both standards give the same rating, 100 psi up to and including 180°F, and SharkBite approves either ring on its fittings for PEX-A, PEX-B and PEX-C. A plain hose clamp is neither.
You have decided on PEX and you are standing in front of two tool kits that do the same job for very different money. One squeezes a copper ring. The other squeezes a stainless clamp. Both make a permanent, code-approved joint, and plumbers argue about them the way they argue about truck brands.
Going the PEX-A expansion route? That method needs its own tool — see PEX expansion tools.
If PEX-A expansion is your route, DeWalt vs Milwaukee PEX expander compares the two cordless tools on heads and battery platform.
Before any of it: a square cut. See the PEX cutter guide.
Here is the actual difference, what the standards say, and the one situation where each is clearly right.
The short answer
Buy cinch (clamp) if you are a homeowner. One tool covers every cinch size (3/8 to 1 inch), SharkBite’s three-handle version is built for one-handed use, and the tool will not release until the clamp is fully closed, so you check the ear by eye. Check the tool’s calibration the way its maker describes. That is our judgment, not a maker ranking.
Buy crimp if you are doing volume or working in tight spaces. The finished joint is lower profile and the ring is symmetrical, but you need the right jaw for each size and a go/no-go gauge to prove the crimp.
Pick one system and stay on it. The rings are not interchangeable, and a truck carrying both is a truck that will eventually put the wrong ring on the wrong fitting.
What each one actually is
Crimp — a copper ring, squeezed round
A seamless copper ring slides over the PEX pipe, the fitting barb goes inside, and a crimp tool compresses the ring evenly around its whole circumference. The result is a symmetrical, low-profile joint.
Brass or poly for the fittings themselves? Water chemistry usually decides it.
This is the system in ASTM F1807. The scope of that standard (section 1.1, quoted on the ASTM store listing linked above) covers metal insert fittings and copper crimp rings, or alternate stainless steel clamps, for PEX in 3/8″, 1/2″, 5/8″, 3/4″, 1″, 1-1/4″, 1-1/2″ and 2″ nominal sizes, intended for use in 100 psi cold- and hot-water distribution systems operating at temperatures up to, and including, 180°F. That rating comfortably exceeds normal residential service.
Cinch / clamp — a stainless band, squeezed at one point
A stainless steel band with a raised tab goes over the tube, and the tool pinches that single tab closed, drawing the band tight. The band tightens uniformly but the joint has an ear sticking out where the tab was compressed.
This is ASTM F2098. People call it cinch, clamp, pinch clamp, or by the trade name Oetiker — same thing. Its scope says the stainless clamps are for use with five sizes of insert fittings that comply with F1807 or F2159 and are “an alternative to the copper-alloy crimp-rings” of F1807. It uses the same insert fittings as crimp, which is why the two systems get confused, and SharkBite says its brass and poly crimp fittings take either ring: the fitting is identical, only the ring changes. One trap: Apollo’s clamp-tool sheets say not to use its tools with Zurn QickClamp rings, so check which tool a brand-specific ring needs before you buy.
The differences that actually matter
| Copper crimp (F1807) | Stainless cinch (F2098) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tool | Size-specific jaws, or a combo tool (Apollo sells one tool for 1/2 and 3/4 inch and one with swappable jaws for 3/8 to 1 inch) | One tool covers every cinch size (3/8 to 1 inch) |
| Verifying the joint | Go/no-go gauge on each ring (SharkBite, Apollo) | Tool will not release until the ear is closed (SharkBite); inspect the closed ear; keep the tool calibrated |
| Tool calibration | SharkBite: handle width 8-1/4 to 8-3/4 in. and a gauge test | SharkBite: gauge in the closed jaws stops at No-Go. Apollo: jaw-gap gauge (0.8 to 1.2 mm on the ratchet model) |
| Joint profile | Low, symmetrical | Raised ear on one side |
| Working one-handed | Keep the tool square to the ring (SharkBite: 90 degrees) | SharkBite’s three-handle tool is built for one-handed use |
| Ring position | 1/8 to 1/4 in. from the pipe end, over the ribs | 1/8 to 1/4 in. from the pipe end (SharkBite); 1/8 in. below the tubing edge (Apollo) |
| Ring material | Copper | Stainless steel |
| Rating in the standard | 100 psi cold and hot water, up to and including 180°F | Same: 100 psi, up to and including 180°F |
| Removing a bad joint | Cut the pipe back, or cut the ring on two opposite sides with a ring removal tool to save the fitting (SharkBite) | Cut the clamp off; iCrimp’s cinch tool kit adds a clamp-removal function |
The verification difference is the real one
A crimp ring can look fine and still be out of spec, which is why the makers ship a go/no-go gauge with the tool. SharkBite’s rule: the Go side slides tightly over the crimped ring and the No-Go side must not slide over it at all. Apollo’s slot gauge reads differently. A ring that will not enter the slot at all is a No-Go: adjust the crimp force and re-crimp. A ring that slides all the way in is compressed too small: remove it and adjust the force. On a failed check, SharkBite says to cut the pipe close to the fitting (or cut the ring on two opposite sides with a removal tool to save the fitting), confirm the tool is calibrated, and start again. Already have a leaking crimp? See PEX crimp fitting leaking.
With cinch, SharkBite says the clamp tool will not release until the clamp is fully closed, and that you should then inspect the closed ear. The check moves to the tool. SharkBite says a properly calibrated clamp tool removes the need to gauge each ring, and both SharkBite and Apollo publish calibration steps for their clamp tools. Apollo says its tools are pre-calibrated for up to 10,000 uses and may need calibration after repeated use; the jaw-gap gauge comes with the tool.
So the honest comparison is one gauge check per crimp joint against one tool-calibration check every so often for cinch. For a first-time installer, cinch has fewer steps per joint. That is our judgment. A pro doing forty joints will use the crimp gauge because it is habit.
Where the profile matters
Our judgment, not a maker claim: the cinch ear protrudes. In open joist bays that is irrelevant. Feeding a line through a tight stud cavity, or where the tube runs close to framing, the lower, symmetrical crimp ring is easier to get past, and it will not catch on a hole edge the way an ear can.
Corrosion, honestly
Neither standard ranks copper against stainless. ASTM F2098 calls its stainless clamps an alternative to the copper crimp rings of F1807, at the same 100 psi and 180°F rating. We found no maker source that says one ring corrodes faster than the other in normal use, so treat the corrosion argument as unproven. If the rings will sit in a constantly wet space, or against concrete or treated lumber, ask the fitting maker which ring it approves for that spot rather than choosing on a rumor.
I send the trade an occasional note when I write one of these comparisons. No sequence behind it.
What is the same — and this is most of it
- The fittings. Both use the same metal insert fittings. Only the ring differs.
- Code acceptance. Both are recognized standards and both are accepted for potable water. Confirm with your local building department on permitted work, as always.
- The tube. Both work on PEX-A, PEX-B and PEX-C. SharkBite’s PEX-A guide says crimp/barb fittings listed to ASTM F1807 are approved for PEX-A, PEX-B and PEX-C, and says the same for its clamp/barb fittings. Cold-expansion connections (ASTM F1960) are PEX-A only and are a separate system; see PEX-A vs PEX-B. Uponor is a caution on its own pipe: it says an expansion connection gives higher flow than insert fittings with crimp rings, and its 25-year warranty is worded for AquaPEX pipe with ProPEX fittings.
- The failure modes. A bad cut, a ring in the wrong position, or a fitting not seated fully will leak on either system. SharkBite says a rough or uneven cut can weaken the joint.
Getting the joint right, either way
- Check the tool. SharkBite’s install steps start with calibration. Test a scrap joint with the gauge before you build the system.
- Cut square. A PEX cutter, not a hacksaw. SharkBite says to cut as cleanly and squarely as possible.
- Slide the ring on first. Everyone forgets this once and has to cut the fitting back off.
- Seat the fitting fully so the tube reaches the fitting shoulder.
- Position the ring correctly — 1/8″ to 1/4″ from the pipe end, over the ribs of the fitting (SharkBite and Apollo crimp sheets). Not hanging off the end, not shoved against the shoulder.
- Compress the ring. For crimp, keep the tool at a 90-degree angle to the fitting and close the handles completely (SharkBite). For cinch, squeeze until the tool is fully closed.
- Verify. Gauge every crimp. For every cinch, inspect the closed ear. Then pressure-test before anything gets closed up.
PEX-A, Ring Types and Hose Clamps
Crimp and cinch rings on PEX-A
Yes on the fitting side. SharkBite’s PEX-A guide lists crimp/barb and clamp/barb fittings as approved for PEX-A, PEX-B and PEX-C. Expansion fittings (ASTM F1960) are the PEX-A-only system: SharkBite says they must be used with PEX-A pipe and expansion rings. If your pipe maker sells an expansion system, read its warranty terms before you mix connection types; Uponor’s, for one, names AquaPEX with ProPEX fittings.
Types of PEX rings and clamps
- Copper crimp ring: squeezed round with a crimp tool (ASTM F1807).
- Stainless cinch (pinch, clamp) ring: closed at one raised ear with a cinch tool (ASTM F2098). Apollo’s clamp-tool sheets list Apollo, Watts, Murray and Oetiker clamps as compatible.
- Zurn QickClamp: a brand-specific ring. Apollo says its clamp tools are not for it, so check Zurn’s instructions for the tool it needs.
- Expansion ring: a PEX-A ring (ASTM F1960) that is a different system altogether.
Hose clamps are not PEX clamps
A screw-type hose clamp is not the stainless clamp ASTM F2098 describes, and SharkBite says to use only fittings and accessories tested and approved for its connection system. No maker sheet we read names hose clamps; use a ring or clamp sold for PEX and listed to F1807 or F2098.
So which should you buy?
Whole-house repipe: either — but crimp’s low profile and symmetry pay off across dozens of joints, and at that volume the gauge is habit rather than a skipped step.
Tight framing, or tube running close to studs: crimp, for the profile.
Damp crawl space, contact with concrete or treated lumber: either, but ask the fitting maker which ring it approves there. No maker source we read ranks the two.
You already own one of the tools: use it. Owning the tool beats the spec difference on essentially every residential job.
For specific tool picks in both systems, see our guide to the best PEX crimp and cinch tools. If you are starting from zero, a PEX starter kit usually beats assembling the pieces separately, and our repipe cost breakdown puts the tooling in context against the rest of the job. Planning a home run manifold? Our top PEX manifold pick, the SharkBite RM22712, takes copper crimp rings or stainless clamps on its 1/2 inch outlets.
The two tools
Heads up: the product links below are Amazon affiliate links — you pay no more, and as an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
- IWISS PEX copper crimp ring tool — the crimp side of this comparison. The listing says it meets ASTM F1807 and includes a 1 inch crimper, 3/8, 1/2 and 3/4 inch jaws and a gauge.
- iCrimp PEX cinch clamp tool — the clamp (cinch) side, and the easier one-tool answer for DIY. The listing says it meets ASTM F2098 for 3/8 to 1 inch stainless clamps, is factory-adjusted, and adds a clamp-removal function. Apollo and SharkBite both publish calibration checks for their own clamp tools, so read whatever manual comes in the box.
All our picks, including go/no-go gauges: the PEX crimp & cinch tool guide.
Frequently asked questions
Is PEX crimp or cinch better?
Neither is better in general. Both standards give the same rating, 100 psi up to and including 180°F, and ASTM F2098 calls its stainless clamps an alternative to the copper crimp rings of F1807. Cinch uses one tool across 3/8 to 1 inch, and SharkBite says the tool will not release until the clamp is fully closed, which makes it the simpler first system for a homeowner (our judgment). Crimp makes a symmetrical joint that is checked with a go/no-go gauge, but needs size-specific jaws. Either tool needs to be kept calibrated.
Can you use crimp rings and cinch clamps on the same fittings?
Yes. SharkBite says its brass and poly crimp fittings take either copper crimp rings or stainless clamp rings. The rings are not interchangeable with each other’s tools, though: use the tool made for the ring, and note that Apollo’s clamp-tool sheets say not to use its tools on Zurn QickClamp rings. Pick one system per job so the wrong ring does not end up on the wrong joint.
What ASTM standard covers PEX crimp and cinch connections?
ASTM F1807 covers metal insert fittings and copper crimp rings, or alternate stainless steel clamps, in 3/8 through 2 inch nominal sizes, for 100 psi cold- and hot-water systems at temperatures up to and including 180 degrees Fahrenheit. ASTM F2098 covers the stainless steel clamps for five sizes of F1807 or F2159 insert fittings, as an alternative to the copper rings, at the same rating. Cold-expansion connections used with PEX-A are a separate standard, ASTM F1960.
Do I need a different crimp tool for each PEX size?
It depends on the tool. Apollo sells one crimp tool for 1/2 and 3/4 inch and another for 3/8 to 1 inch with swappable jaws (the 1 inch ring needs no jaw). SharkBite sells its crimp tool in sizes from 3/8 to 2 inch. Stainless cinch tools handle 3/8 to 1 inch with a single tool, which is a large part of their appeal for occasional use.
How do I know a PEX crimp is good?
Use the go/no-go gauge that ships with the tool. SharkBite: the Go side should slide tightly over the crimped ring and the No-Go side should not slide over it at all. Apollo: a ring that will not enter the gauge slot is a No-Go, so adjust the crimp force and re-crimp; a ring that slides all the way in is compressed too small. If a check fails, SharkBite says to cut the pipe close to the fitting (or remove the ring by cutting it on two opposite sides), confirm the tool is calibrated, and start again. Then pressure-test before closing any walls.
How do I check a PEX cinch clamp, and does the tool need calibration?
SharkBite says to squeeze until the clamp is completely compressed (the tool will not release until it is) and then inspect the clamp for correct closed-ear form. Cinch tools do need calibration checks. SharkBite’s test is to close the handles and put the Go/No-Go gauge in the jaw gap; it should stop at No-Go. Apollo says its tools are pre-calibrated for up to 10,000 uses and may need calibration after repeated use, checked with its jaw-gap gauge (0.8 to 1.2 mm on its ratchet model, 1.2 to 1.4 mm on its one-hand LED model).
Can you use cinch clamps or crimp rings on PEX-A?
SharkBite’s PEX-A guide lists crimp/barb fittings (ASTM F1807) and clamp/barb fittings as approved for PEX-A, PEX-B and PEX-C. Expansion fittings (ASTM F1960) work only with PEX-A. Uponor says its expansion connection gives higher flow than insert fittings with crimp rings, and its warranty is worded for AquaPEX pipe with ProPEX fittings, so check your pipe maker’s terms first.
Can you use a hose clamp on PEX?
Not for a PEX joint. No maker sheet we read names hose clamps, but ASTM F2098 covers stainless clamps that are deformed and locked around the tubing to force it onto the ribs of an insert fitting, and a screw-type hose clamp is not that product. SharkBite says to use only fittings and accessories tested and approved for its connection system. Use a ring or clamp sold for PEX and listed to F1807 or F2098.
Are stainless cinch clamps better than copper crimp rings for corrosion?
No maker source we read says so. ASTM F2098 describes the stainless clamps as an alternative to the copper crimp rings at the same rating, and neither standard ranks the two on corrosion. If a ring will sit in a constantly wet space, or against concrete or treated lumber, ask the fitting maker which ring it approves for that spot.
Sources
- ASTM F1807 — Metal Insert Fittings Utilizing a Copper Crimp Ring (or alternate stainless clamps) for PEX Tubing (sizes, 100 psi / 180°F rating)
- ASTM F2098 — Stainless Steel Clamps for Securing SDR9 PEX Tubing to Insert Fittings (five sizes, alternative to copper rings, same rating)
- SharkBite — How to install PEX crimp and clamp fittings; crimp tool calibration; clamp tool calibration; PEX-A installation guide
- Apollo PEX crimp tool and go/no-go gauge instruction sheet; pinch clamp tool and one-hand pinch clamp tool sheets
- Uponor — Not all PEX is created equal (expansion vs crimp-ring flow) and Uponor FAQ (warranty wording)
- ASTM F1960 — Cold Expansion Fittings with PEX Reinforcing Rings
One practical note the spec sheets skip: removing either ring means cutting metal. SharkBite says a crimp ring can be taken off by cutting it on at least two opposing sides with its ring removal tool, which saves the fitting; a cinch clamp is normally cut off, and iCrimp’s cinch tool kit adds a clamp-removal function. See how to remove a PEX crimp ring or cinch clamp.
For the plumbers reading this
Most of this site is written for homeowners — this page clearly isn’t. If you’re in the trade and want the occasional straight-shooting note when I publish something like this (fittings comparisons, tool guides, code changes), drop your email. No spam, no course funnel, written by a licensed GA journeyman.
